| |
What is OPSTM
(Operational-cashflow Per Share)?
"OPS" is StockDiagnostics.com acronym for
"Operational-cashflow Per Share."
Our "OPS" (Operational-cashflow Per Share) is
derived from a corporations' actual quarterly or annual Cash
Flow Statement. The
specific section is entitled "Cash Flow used or provided by
Operations." "OPS"
is calculated by dividing a company's Cash Flow from
Operations by the total number of shares outstanding.
Cash Flow from Operations is a company's financial
lifeblood. A
sudden change in Cash Flow from Operations can drain this
lifeblood, causing an increase in debt, share dilution, share
price erosion and in the more extreme cases, bankruptcy.
StockDiagnostics.com created "OPS"
(Operational-cashflow Per Share) to
focus stockholders on the real values of a company as opposed
to artificial values for EPS, CFPS (EBITDA) that can be
produced by creative accounting.
(See: "What is EPS, CFPS, EBITDA) Enron's
collapse clearly reinforces the need to examine "OPS"
(Operational-cashflow Per Share).
Fundamentally, any reported EPS or Net Income must be
contrasted with StockDiagnostics.com "OPS" (Operational-cashflow Per Share). In the table below you can
see how this contrast applied to Enron.
| Enron's
OPSTM vs. EPS for 2001 |
| Quarter |
OPSTM |
EPS |
| Q1 (3/31/01) |
-$ .62 |
+$ .54 |
| Q2 (6/30/01) |
-$ 1.16 |
+$ .51 |
| Q3 (9/30/01) |
+$ .79 |
-
$ .89 |
Enron's table shows the dramatic differences between StockDiagnostics.com "OPS" (Operational-cashflow Per Share) and EPS (Earnings Per Share), a manufactured, financial interpretation. Our "OPS" (Operational-cashflow Per Share) for Enron was negative for the first two quarters and positive for the third quarter of 2001. Enron's EPS results were the exact opposite.
|